Abstract

Background: The introduction sets the stage for the study by highlighting the increasing importance of international commercial arbitration in resolving cross-border business disputes. It underscores the significance of analyzing the factors leading to the refusal to recognize and enforce foreign commercial arbitration rulings in Pakistan and the UK.

Methodology: This section details the research methodology employed in the study. It highlights the comparative approach used to examine case studies and legal frameworks in both jurisdictions. The doctrinal legal method is explained as the chosen analytical tool for scrutinizing the grounds for rejection in Pakistan and the UK. A clear explanation of the methodology ensures transparency and replicability of the study.

Results: The results section synthesizes the findings from the comparative analysis. It highlights commonalities and differences in the grounds for rejection in Pakistan and the UK. The section presents a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to the efficacy or inefficacy of the recognition and enforcement processes in both nations.

Discussion: Building on the results, study the importance of consistency and clarity in international commercial arbitration legislation for ensuring the reliability and implementation of foreign arbitral awards.