Abstract

This study provides an in-depth investigation of Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) and its function in legislative procedures during the Musharraf administration, from 2002 to 2007. During this period, MMA, a coalition of six Islamist groups, became a prominent political entity, influencing the development of Pakistan’s democratic stance resisting the President Pervez Musharraf. This research examines the impact of the legislative policies and initiatives of MMA on the democratic environment, namely within the framework of Musharraf's semi-authoritarian ruling system. It also analyses the interaction between MMA and Musharraf's government, emphasizing episodes of both cooperation and conflict. It examines how the opposition of MMA on Musharraf’s legislative moves, which encompass their endeavors to advance Islamic ideals inside the legal system, their impact on significant reforms, and their challenges in reconciling ideological objectives with practical governance. This research examines the issues by utilizing qualitative methodology through collection of data from secondary sources. Through careful analysis of certain legislative measures and policy discussions, the study evaluates the efficacy of MMA in promoting its objectives and its influence on the wider democratic process. This analysis determined the achievements and constraints of the coalition in maneuvering through the political environment, providing valuable perspectives on the dynamics between Islamist political movements and authoritarian state institutions. The study elucidated the intricate connection between Islamist parties and democratic institutions in Pakistan. By offering unique insights into the problems and opportunities faced by political movements in semi-democratic contexts, it enhanced the understanding of how political alliances can impact legislative processes and democratic government.