Abstract

The process of writing in Peruvian universities has always faced difficulties in making scientific production visible. In the Peruvian case, only 1.3% of students engage in writing and qualify as researchers, and this figure is closely related to the number of students in each university. Based on the analysis of the results, the Chakana question is proposed as a strategy for writing publishable texts in peer-reviewed journals. Documentary analysis was conducted, which included a 436-word text, thirteen articles, 21 books, and four sources from official organizations, as well as those related to the Chakana question. The results revealed the relevance of the strategy, as the structure of the article's body revolved around divergent analysis, which promotes critical thinking without seeking definitive answers. The conclusions emphasized the usefulness and relevance of the strategy in creating new spaces for analyzing Paulo Freire's narrative.